Re: Community Info Web Page

MalNechis@AOL.COM
Tue, 24 Oct 1995 10:17:14 -0400

Last week I had an opportunity to browse the material on the Emlin, Peekskill
and Teatown, and then, via Yahoo.com, to access other US and international
arts groups and arts umbrella organizations. The difference is quite
striking. One set of implementations reflects current practice on the World
Wide Web, including a recognition that every site needs to generate
significant interest in order to hope to meet the test of the marketplace.
The other represents a basically pre-Web approach, which assumes that
interested people will either 1) proactively seek and use information
sources, regardless of layout, style, readability or content or 2) sign up
for traditional 'listserve' information processes.

In a rich and growing information world (as of 8/31/95 there are over 100,000
commercial Web ID's, growing at 15,000 - 20,000 per month), the latter method
is likely to have great difficulty in getting heard, much less generating
significant attention or interest. The difference is much more than the
inclusion of a few graphics (some of which are a real distraction from the
site's message) or a variety of fonts or styles. The difference is also more
than merely repackaging print-based text to fit a 15 inch computer screen.
Even the academics, who have something to publicize or promote, have gotten
this message.

If WATPA hopes to be recognized for its interest and expertise in the
emerging world of telecommunications, then it is essential that we lead by
good example. One approach would be to form a 'digital information
distribution' committee to help chart WATPA's activities (both our own
electronic communications and those in support of our constituents) through
this emerging world.