> that fit) it may be a practical approach for WATPA. Does anyone out there haved
> suggestions on the authoring tools we should consider? If so, I'll be glad to
> investigate and make some recommendations.
The whole reason it's in the format it's in is for speed: No one has time
to individually format each page.
Rather than pick a standard tool, how about pick a volunteer to take
every piece submitted, convert it from whatever format it was submitted
in into HTML, add pictures, pick fonts, pick a background, tweak the
colors, etc ... and let THEM pick the tool they like ?
My point being: Anyone who doesn't like the way the pages look is free to
rewrite them and maintain them. If you have the time, great. I don't
think the current people working on it do. I don't even have the time to
make pages like currently exist !
This isn't directed at you Warren, just the discussion in general.
Now as to actually answering your question: I write HTML with a text
editor myself. I find most of the current authoring tools actually are
more dificult than writting by hand. There are macro extentions to word,
HotMetal, and a bunch of others.
-Chris
==========================================================
Chris Candreva -- chris@westnet.com -- (914) 967-7816
WestNet Internet Services of Westchester
http://www.westnet.com/